Tuesday, 18 October 2016
PROCEDURE OF GETTING ETHICS AND ANTI-CORRUPTION (EACC) CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE IN KENYA
Have you ever been required to have an EACC clearance while applying for a public job in Kenya?
Saturday, 2 July 2016
MOBILE MONEY TELEPHONY
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION OF THE STUDY
1.1Introductionwww.flamencoengineers.co.ke
The
introductory chapter covers the foundation of the study with the details of the
background information, statement of the problem, objectives of the study,
research questions and significance of the study limitations and concludes with
the scope of the study. In this regard
therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate various variables that
determine the customer’schoiceof mobile money transfer services and how they
can impact an overall performance of business organizations and assists in
addressing the challenges faced by enterprises while trying to build
sustainable future in the context of our national vision 2030.
1.2 Background of the Study www.mirgaconsultancies.wordpress.com
Organizations
offering mobile phone money transfer services, both private and public, in
today’s dynamic market place and market space are increasingly leaving
antiquated marketing philosophies , policies and strategies to the adoption of
more custom-driven initiatives that seek
to understand , attract and build intimate long term relationship with
profitable customers(Kotler,2006) .
This
paradigm shift has undauntedly led to the growing interest in strategic
customer relationship management initiatives that aim at ensuring customer
perception, identification, interaction, customization and personalization and
unreservedly lead to the customer satisfaction, retention and ultimate
profitability (Thomson, 2004). The organizations are therefore increasingly being more customer-centric and
interested not just in acquiring new customers but more importantly retaining
existing customers . This is because the cost is more to attract new customers
than to retain existing ones (Reichheld, 2006).
The mobile
Money sector in Kenya and globally is growing at a tremendous rate and each and
every month new aggressive rate innovative players enter the sector with new
standards ways of providing customer satisfaction solutions (Munyoki and
Mutua,2010) . It is therefore important for every player in the sector to understand
the factors that determine the customers’ choice of mobile money transfer
services through an understanding of the kind of business we are in and the
challenges facing it. This study was set to identify the factors that determine
the customer’s choice of mobile money customers during utilization of the
services that come along with the product.
Stiff
competition in Kenya’s financial sector is forcing institutions into adopting
new forms of technology to reduce the costs of doing business and widen customer
outreach for enhanced profitability. Use of MMT technology in the banking
industry has become usual in recent years as a way of maintaining customer
loyalty and increasing market share. The new innovative systems (such as mobile
banking) are especially targeting the earning but unbanked population in rural
and hard to reach areas.
According
to Nasikye (2009). Mobile banking (m-banking) involves the use of a mobile
phone or another mobile device to undertake financial transactions linked to a
client account. According to (Owen, 2008) m-banking refers to provision and
availing of banking and financial service with the help of mobile
telecommunication device. Services include balance checks, account
transactions, payments, credit applications and other banking transactions
through a mobile device such as mobile phone which is most used in developing
countries or Personal Digital Assistant (PDA).
The
technology innovations have influenced the banking sector in one way or
another. Kassim (2005) explains that the technological revolution has produced
new developments in the banking industry. According to Oryiek (2008) the first
ATM in Uganda was brought by SCI for Standard Chartered Bank in 1997 and SCI
has been an active catalyst in the rapid growth and development of electronic
banking in the country hence the introduction of m-banking few years ago and
this explains why Standard Chartered Bank is ranked as one of the performing
banks in Uganda.
Mobile
banking has transformed the way people in the developing world transfer money
and now it is poised to offer more sophisticated banking services which could
make a real difference to people’s lives. This type of banking can offer a wide
variety of services ranging from account information, which has to do with alerting
the customers on the updates and transactions on their account through their
mobile phones. People receive short messages on their phones informing them of
their immediate transactions in their bank accounts. Also, they help in
payments (utility bills), deposits, withdrawals, transfers, purchase airtime,
request bank statements and perform other crucial banking tasks all in real
time over their mobile phones. Banks including Standard Chartered Bank (Uganda)
(Buyer and lenders, 2001) have largely implemented service delivery technology
as a way of augmenting the service traditionally provided by personnel,
Howcraft, Bacett,(1996) .
Mobile
money transfer services were launched at different times by the communication
service providers. Safaricom launched the M-Pesa Service in 2000, Zain now
Airtel, joined in 2008 with its ZAP services, and other companies namely YU and
Orange have the services in its pilot stages. Mbogoh (2010), points out that
Airtel has partnered with leading international and regional banks including
housing finance, cooperative and standard chartered to offer ZAP services which
has allowed Airtel customer in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania use their mobile
phones to carry out transactions across the borders. Mobile banking has become
an important channel to sell products and services perceived to be a necessity
in order to stay profitable and successful. A study released by Bill and
Mulinda Gates foundation said mobile operators are investing in the field of
mobile payments to compete with banks “the mobile particularly for telecom
operators and banks” a sector of the report said, (Donna 2007). A customer
relations is all about creating understanding through knowledge and
communication with the customers in the in the provision of mobile money
transfer services.
Providing
quality services to customers is the prime focus of any business organization.
The overall focus of most organizations are finding, attracting
and winning new customers to their services, nurturing
and retaining existing customers, enticing former customers back into the fold
and reducing the costs of marketing and customer service. Though
customer perception is
subjective component of consumer satisfaction, it is very critical for any
business to understand how customers perceive the services it offers. Studies
on customer satisfaction and perception are many and address various aspects of
customer decision-making process.
Indeed, over the
years, theorists have attempted to explain the reasons why customers enjoy the
services offered. Accordingly, issues of perception and issues of the role of
stimuli have been explained by various
authors. For instance, according to Ashford and Beamish(2008), the nature
of physical stimuli tends to influence the degree of perception for example, an ordered
array of objects on display or a sudden loud noise are almost sure to attract
attention.
The senses are stimulated by
unexpected or unusual objects or events. In a fairly predictable routine of
everyday life, an individual tend to seek variety and change in a bid to get satisfaction.
1.2.1 Profile of Thika
Thika is a
good distributed area. It is in the central province of Kenya, in Kiambu
County, Juja constituency, in Thika sub-county it has developed because it is
an industrial town also known as the Birmingham of Kenya because of development
of industries and because of the people who are also entrepreneurs. This has
motivated many people to set many businesses in the area. The main economic
activity is however coffee which has contributed greatly in the enlargement of
other businesses. We all need to send money and save money easily so there are
money transfer services like M-Pesa this is very vital for each an every one
leading to development of banks like equity which has mobile services called
M-Kesho and M-Shwari and the most recent E-quitel which is a link between them
and safaricom. However there are other business like agro vet , bars and
restaurant , petrol stations, hardware, butchery , barber shops, e.t.c which
they all need the money transfer services. Which are quite plenty to provide
quality transactions and which have provided efficiency and good time
management.
1.2.2 Map of Thika
1.3 Statement of The Problem
According
to Mutua and Munyoki (2010), a number of studies have been done in Kenya on the
responses to challenges and factors encountered in restricted banking hours and
the accessibility to the banks and other money transfer institutions in Kenya;
for example Maina (2000) focused on, perceived quality and value preposition by
customers but failed to study the factors that determine the customer’s choice
of mobile money transfer services (MMTS) such as prices, technology, services
and competition.
Another
study done by Odhiambo(2003) focused on factors that influence customers’
satisfaction and services offered by mobile money firms but failed to focus on
one product or service to find out the exact reaction of the customers on the
effectiveness of such a product.
The
problem of this study was propelled by the need to empirically identify and
analyze the factors that were facing or affecting the users (customers) of
mobile money transfer services in Kenya.
1.4 Objectives of The Study
The main
objective of this study was to identify the factors that determine the customer’s
choice of mobile money transfer services in Kenya with a particular focus of
Thika sub-county in Kiambucounty.
1.4.1 Specific Objectives
(i) To
determine how competition affects customers choice of mobile money transfer
services.
(ii) To
investigate whether services offered determines customer’s choice of mobile
money transfer services.
(iii) To
find out whether prices offered to customers determines customer’s choice of
mobile money transfer services.
(iv) To
access whether technology determines customers choice of mobile money transfer
services.
1.5 Research Questions
(i) How
does competition determine customer’s choice of mobile money transfer services?
(ii) How
does the provision of quality services influence customer’s choice of mobile
money transfer services?
(iii) How does offering good
prices determine the customer’s choice of mobile money transfer services?
(iv) What
is the effect of technology in determining the customer’s choice of mobile
money transfer services?
1.6 Significance of the Study
1.6.1To Mobile Money Transfer Product
Developers
To the
Mobile Money Transfer companies such as Safaricom, Orange Kenya and Airtel
Kenya, the study findings and results that have been reported in this study
provides more reliable scientific measure and perspective for describing and
evaluating the level of their customer perception and satisfaction with the
services they deliver. The study also serves as an invaluable source of
information that brings to limelight on the switching intentions of their respective
customers. It uncovers dimensions of service quality that customer consider as
important as well as customers intention to switch other competitors networks.
1.6.2
Customers
To
enlighten customers on mobile services delivery for those who don’t use it and
for those who use the service on how well they have embraced the service and
how they feel about it.
1.6.3
Other researchers.
The study
will be very significant to the other researchers who will be interested in
conducting research in the same field because it will act as a point of
reference. The other researchers will also benefit since they will have a broad
understanding on customer relationship and therefore research on areas which
are covered. This will enrich existing literature as other researchers will use
it in their studies and for analysis purposes.
1.6.4Organizations
The
results of the study will also enable other communication service providers to
understand how mobile money transfer services delivery can enhance that
performance. They will benefit from the research because they will be able to
identify the gaps on customer relationship and those effects on organization’s
performance.
1.7 Limitations of the Study
1.7.1Non Cooperation
In pursuit
of this study, several limitations were encountered. Some employees
didnotanswerall the questions in the questionnaire. Some employees feared that
the information theywillgive could be accessed by their supervisors and this
affected their willingness to fill all the questions honestly. This was solved
by assuring them that their names will remain private and also the names of
their business.
1.7.2 Language Barrier
One of the limiting factors of the
study was language barrier where respondents wereissued with written questionnaires
but some were not able to understand the language well. The researcher solved
this by analyzing the written questionnaire to their local language or taking
an interpreter with them when required.
1.7.3 Noise pollution
In the
central business district (CBD) where the information wasgathered the
environment was very noisy hence the communication was not clear due to high
music playing and the vehicles passing & hooting and due to the noise thus
a limitation was experienced in the study. The researcher solved this by allowing
the most affected respondents to take the questionnaire with them to their
homes and then return them once fully filled.
1.7.4 Fear
Initially
some of the respondents that were issued with questionnaires did not return
them. During data collection, some of the respondents were not willing to give
the data due to fear of data privacy especially in the mobile money transfer
sector. As a result, at first i was unable to get access to some valuable
information and other records which would have enabled me to access the views
of other individuals in this mobile money sector. But this was solved by
assuring them that the collected data was to be used only for research purposes
and not beyond that.
1.7.5 Biasness
Lack of etiquette, during the questionnaire sessions was
experienced as most of thepeople don’t like questions and some tend even to be
rude to you instead of giving you the required information. The researcher
solved this by showing the respondents that the collected data was vital for
each an every user of the mobile money transfer services.
1.8 Scope of the study
This study was carried out to
identify the factors that determine the customer’s choice of mobile money
transfer services users in Thika, KiambuCounty. The information was gathered from
the service providers’ agents like M-Pesa and Zap agents and also from
customers such as businessmen & women who enjoys the service. The target
population was120respondents. Questionnaires containing close ended questions
were used as instruments for collecting data. The researcher then narrowed down
the sample size to 30 respondents sincesurveysampling design was employed. The
research took place between January to June 2016.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
In this chapter, literature, which is
related to and significantly relevant to the objectives of this study, is
reviewed. Important theoretical literature and practical problems are reviewed
and their input to mobile banking service.
2.2 Review of Theoretical Literature
Over the last decade,
mobile money transfer access has experienced a strong growth across the globe.
Over 57 percent of adult population in developing world has access to these
services. Over90 percent of adult population in western world have access. The
widespread adoption of mobile phones for example in developing countries offers
many opportunities for the use of information and communication technology
(ICT) in mobile banking.
As a result of this trend, mobile
money transfer technologies have attracted various industries to use mobile
infrastructure and networks for their product and service offerings. The fact
that there is about a population of 2.8
billion adults worldwide without access to financial services, but the use of
mobile phones as a medium for mobile money transfer for instance offers a
significant opportunity for telecommunication companies to step in and provide
a much needed service. In the convergence of banking and telecommunication
companies, the operators have the required technical expertise as well as a
wide network of agents to realize this endeavor.
Mobile banking (m-banking) refers to
provision of banking and financial services through the help of mobile
telecommunication devices. The scope of offered services may include facilities
to conduct bank and stock market transactions, administer accounts and to
access customized information. Mobile networks in Kenya offer m-money services
in the name of M-pesa by Safaricom, Orange money by Orange, Yu-cash by Essar,
and Airtel money by Airtel. There are over 15 million customers using Mpesa
services in Kenya for example. M-money providers have partnered with MFIs
commercial banks such as faulu Kenya, Kenya women, rafiki among others to offer
mobile based financial products that aim to reach the unbanked.
2.2.1 Competition
According to Bickerton (1998) Competition is a contest between
individuals, groups, nations, animals, etc. for territory, a niche, or a
location of resources. It arises whenever two or more parties strive for a goal
which cannot be shared. Competition occurs naturally between living organisms
which co-exist in the same environment. For example, animals compete over water
supplies, food, and mates, etc. Humans compete for water, food, and mates,
though when these needs are met deep rivalries often arise over the pursuit of
wealth, prestige, and fame. Business is often associated with competition as
most companies are in competition with at least one other firm over the same
group of customers. This is the ability to race rival partner by having an
organized test of comparative skills and performance. Hence when a company
develops a product, the major objective is to make the product a preference in
the market. The company must therefore ensure those products demand increases so
as to make more sales. The demand therefore will be influenced by price,
overall size of the population and the distribution of income. Competition is
probably the most dynamic of all the environmental factors. In a free economy,
a new organization enter where others exist, therefore causing unpredictability
in the market careful monitoring and evaluation of the competition enables
marketing management to make informal decision.
Bickerton
(1998) Continuous new product development is the driving force for economic
growth and the social welfare improvement. Firms introduce new products or
brands to crowd the product space so as to cannibalize market share and profit
from rival firms and to deter the potential entry, while consumers benefit from
having more products with difference attributes to meet their demand and from
the lower price on existing brands due to new product introduction. There is
estimation of the effects of a new product introduction, east Africa breweries
limited (EABL), on market competition and consumer welfare change in soft drink
industry in United States from a combined household level and store level
dataset. The overall competitive effects are decomposed into two parts: the
effect on the prices of existing products from increased competition, and the
effect of having additional product variety.
However, Stephen (2006) and
others have argued that as one ascends the evolutionary hierarchy,
competitiveness (the survival instinct) becomes less innate, and more a learned
behavior. The same could be said for co-operation: in humans, at least, both
co-operation and competition are considered learned behaviors, because the
human species learns to adapt to environmental pressures. Consequently, if
survival requires competitive behaviors, the individual will compete, and if
survival requires co-operative behaviors, the individual will co- operate. In
the case of humans, therefore, aggressiveness may be an innate characteristic,
but a person need not be competitive at the same time, for instance when
scaling a cliff.On the other hand, humans seem also to have a nurturing
instinct, to protect newborns and the weak. While that does not necessitate
co-operative behavior, it does help. The term also applies to econometrics.
Here, it is a comparative measure of the ability and performance of a firm or
sub-sector to sell and produce/supply goods and/or services in a given market.
The two academic bodies of thought on the assessment of competitiveness are the
Structure Conduct Performance Paradigm and the more contemporary New Empirical
Industrial Organization model. Rother (1997) defines competitive advantage as
the company’s ability to perform in one or more ways that competitors will not
match. William Perreant and Jerome also define competitive advantage as a firm
having marketing mix that the largest market sees as better than a competitor’s
mix. Predicting changes in the competitiveness of business sectors is becoming
an integral and explicit step in public policymaking. Within capitalist
economic systems, the drive of enterprises is to maintain and improve their own
competitiveness. The tendency toward extreme, unhealthy competition has been
termed hyper competitiveness. This concept originated in Karen Horney's
theories on neurosis; specifically, the highly aggressive personality type
which is characterized as "moving against people". In her view, some
people have a need to compete and win at all costs as a means of maintaining
their self-worth. These individuals are likely to turn any activity into a
competition, and they will feel threatened if they find themselves losing.
Researchers have found that men and women who score high on the trait of hyper
competitiveness are more narcissistic and less psychologically healthy than
those who score low on the trait. Hypercompetitive individuals generally
believe that "winning isn't everything; it's the only thing"
Martin, Julian (1988) competition in the mature stage comes from
several sources one of which is well and improved product. A direct competition
forms other service providers is not only the competitive disadvantage that the
mature product suffers. Saleemi (1997) argues that competition relates to
rivalry or attempt to gain advantage market place. The term usually denotes two
or more sellers or service providers and two or more customers exchanging a
product with buyers and sellers acting independently.He also continues and says
that competition can be looked at a number of ways: economists consider
competition as a struggle among companies in the same industry. They often
differentiate perfect from imperfect and oligopoly from monopoly. However, the
marketers view the competition in a broader perspective e.g., competition
exists not only between similar products but between also dissimilar products
too. Therefore, it is an established fact over the years that marketing system
has become increasingly competitive. Saleemi finally says that competition is a
reality, which cannot be avoided.According to Berkowitz, et al (2007), there
are four basic forms of competition: Pure competition-Every company has a
similar product. Monopolistic competition-the sellers compete with their
products on a substitutable basis. Oligopoly competition-A common industry
structure occurs when a few companies control the majority of the industry
sales or services. Monopoly competition-occurs when only one firm sells or
offers the product i.e. goods or services.
According to Porter
(competitive strategy 1980), there are five primary competitive factors within
any industry as described below: Firms entering an industry bring new capacity
and a desire to gain market share and profit. Nevertheless, whether new firms
enter an industry depends on the barriers to entry which includes; economies of
scale, brand identity, switching cost, capital requirement, government policies
among others.
However,
established firms in an industry may benefit from ―experience curve ―effects
i.e. their cumulative experience in producing and marketing a product often
reduces per unit cost below those of inexperience firms. Powerful suppliers
reduce the profitability of an industry if companies in the industry cannot pay
higher prices to cover price increases that the supplier imposes. Buyers
compete with the industry by forcing prices down, bargaining for higher quality
or more services and playing competitors off against each other like was the
case in the oil industry. All these are at the expense of industry
profitability.
All firms in an industry are competing with
industries providing substitute products. Substitute limit the potential
returns in an industry by making a ceiling on the prices that firms in the industry
can profitably charge. This is the convectional type of competition in which
firms try to take customers from one another. They employ strategies suchas
price competition, advertising patterns, new products introduction and
increased customer activities. According to Porter (1980), whether a company’s
competitors can carry out their strategies and reach their goals depends on
each competitor’s resources and capabilities. A company should gather recent
information on each competitor’s business. Industry data on sales or loading
incase of transport industry, market share, profit margin, return on
investment, cash flows, new investment and capacity utilization. Companies
should do this through secondary data; personal experience etc. They can argue
their knowledge by conducting primary marketing research with customers,
suppliers and dealers.
All these sources
helps a company decide whom to attach in the programmatic control market and
who to avoid. Financial risk management is the driving force for economic
growth and the social welfare improvement. Manufacturing Firms introduce new
products or brands to crowd the product space so as to cannibalize market share
and profit from rival firms and to deter the potential entry, while consumers
benefit from having more products with difference attributes to meet their
demand and from the lower price on existing brands due to new product
introduction. This paper estimates the effects of a new product introduction;
the overall competitive effects are decomposed into two parts: the effect on
the prices of existing products from increased competition, and the effect of
having additional product variety.
Competition policy across different countries
indicates that in most jurisdictions, the basic objectives are to maintain and
encourage the process of competition in order to promote efficient use of
resources while protecting the freedom of economic action of various market
participants. Competition policy has been generally viewed to achieve or
preserve a number of other objectives as well: pluralism, de-centralization of
economic decision-making, preventing abuses of economic power, promoting small
business, fairness and equity and other socio-political values. It has been
noted that these “supplementary” objectives tend to vary across jurisdictions
and over time. The latter reflects the changing nature and adaptability of
competition policy so as to address current concerns of society while remaining
steadfast to the basic objectives.
Earl,
P. (2007). Competition policy is a term that has been used loosely to describe
a wide range of government measures directed at affecting the behavior of
suppliers and the structure of the industry with the aim of facilitating
competitive markets. With competition policy in telecommunications being
increasingly characterized by complex and diverse approaches taken by different
countries, it has become necessary to take stock and to draw out the lessons of
experience in order to identify key elements that can be used by a growing
number of countries that have introduced varying degrees of competition in
their telecommunications market. This paper is intended to provide a framework
for understanding some of the evolving competition policy approaches that have
been taken and the competition issues they have been designed to address.
Competition
is often thought of a fairly obvious thing, a rivalry. In a market context the
meaning of competition is usually taken to be a rivalry among the sellers. In
competitive terms this includes the familiar competition among sellers but
there is also the possibility of competition between sellers and consumers, as
well as competition among consumers. According toWaterson, M. (2003)the
term competition can call to
mind different thoughts, depending on how an individual thinks about it. A
competition can be a test. For some it appears as an opportunity to succeed;
for others the threat of failure looms. In markets, it may mean a salubrious
contest to better serve customers, or may mean a ruinous bout of cutthroat
price wars.(Scherer and Ross 1990)Emphasize that telecom market is
characterized by imperfect competition, regulation, advanced technology,
network externalities, strategic gaming, and entry. Policymakers who substitute
their intuition for careful modeling of this market do so at their own
peril. Competition is seen as beneficial
for consumers, and is thus evaluated as a positive state of affairs. Indeed,
competition among sellers is widely seen as necessary to secure the benefits of
market exchange to consumers. The concept of seller vs. seller competition is
embodied in the neoclassical economics that forms the basic assumption about
markets and frames the understanding of many, probably most, market observers
and policymakers. Incorporated in this notion is a belief in the
self-regulating property of markets. Under this assumption markets are held to
be efficient in the allocation of resources and effective in delivering
consumer benefits when driven by competition, in contrast to regulation by government
or domination by a large firm or cartel.
2.2.2 Services
Frempong (2009) mobile phone ownership increased access to
markets, contributed to efficiency in conducting business. However, this study
revealed limited capacity to operate other financial services that are possible
through the system and related to mobile money services such as sending and
receiving money.
To
subscribe to mobile money services a phone Subscriber Identity Module (SIM)
card must be purchased and activated in a mobile device. This is followed by
creating or registering a mobile money account with the mobile money provider
of choice which allows the client to make a cash deposit from mobile money
provider agents or receive deposit from other subscribers. The cash deposited creates
electronic money credit in the customer’s account. Once a deposit is made, the
subscriber can send money electronically to another person registered in the
same or different network, or withdraw the deposit from a mobile money network
provider agent.
Additional
features in the mobile phones allows the customer to use the electronic credits
for other transactions like paying bills, purchasing goods at shops,
supermarkets and virtual stores, purchase airtime, purchase mobile phone
services like ring tones and songs amongst other uses. The customers receive a
text message on the phone regarding the transaction made, the recipient
information for the purchase and the account balance.
It
is currently possible to make direct electronic transfers to mobile money
accounts from certain banks that have established systems to do so. Network
providers charge a fee for transaction which include; a fee from the sender who
is initiating the transaction and a fee charged from the recipient when
withdrawing or subsequently sending the money to another person.
The
growth of mobile money services in Kenya has been particularly dramatic because
it has overtaken the banking network in a very short time. This has been made
possible through the expansion of financial agents who enabled growth to exceed
the traditional banking outlets by a wide margin. For example, by August 2010,
M-Pesa had enlisted 12.6 million customers and nearly 20,000 agents countrywide
compared to only 1510 ATMs and 1,030 banks and bank branches (Zutt, 2010).The
great number of mobile money agents located in almost all parts of the country
has increased the convenience of the service which is one of the attributes
that has resulted in increased number of subscribers. Mobile money has achieved
penetration across all age groups which is a phenomenal achievement of new
technology unlike others which often focuses on a certain age group. Despite
this, older customers are more likely to use the service only to receive money.
The usage is highest in subscribers between the ages of 25 to 29 and reduces
thereafter. But even amongst the oldest Kenyan (above 65 years), half use
mobile money (Zutt, 2010).
On
the other hand, women are less likely than men to use mobile money, and are
more likely to only receive and not send funds, a finding by Zutt (2010). He
further notes that in 2009, mobile money was initially concentrated among the
wealthy in Kenya but has since grown rapidly to include the poor. Other
demographic information related to mobile money usage indicates that it is
highest among urban Kenyans, but with substantial penetration among rural
residents.As of August 2009, 47% of rural Kenyan adults and 69% of urban Kenyan
adults had used mobile money (Zutt, 2010). The most common use of mobile money
has remained receiving money followed by sending money. Other uses slowly
gaining pace include purchase of airtime, save money, purchase during
traveling, make donations, receive payments, purchase of goods and services,
ATM withdrawals, pay bills, and receive or pay salaries/wages. These other uses
have gained momentum over time, but do not as yet compared to receiving or
sending money. The recent trends are usage of mobile money more to pay school
fees, to remit electricity and other monthly bills and recently as means of
payment in supermarkets. Mobile money is quickly taking the place of
alternatives methods of sending money previously used. By 2009 for example,
mobile money transfer had almost entirely displaced transfers via the post
office and via bus or minibus, which were previously popular methods (Zutt,
2010). The percentage using alternatives like bank transfers, Western Union
money transfer, Money Gram and friends has been decreasing significantly and
has almost been completely replaced by mobile money services.
M-Pesa
from Safaricom has been studied in detail by Mbiti& Weil (2011) who
observed certain patterns of usage. Even though the M-Pesa is not used for
money storage, it has this potential even though the primary purpose has been
to send and receive money. Access and use of more sophisticated financial
services through mobile money services like savings, credit, and insurance
could prove more beneficial (Donovan, 2011). Mobile money services can also be
viewed as a variation of branchless banking with the potential for delivery of
financial services outside conventional banking. can have a number of useful
benefits which include access to financial services like making deposits and
savings, accessing the formal banking sector through mobile money services and
accessibility of mobile payment services, transaction costs, convenience and
security, perceived support from mobile payment operators, satisfaction with
mobile payment services, and actual usage of mobile payment and business
performance .
Savings money
through mobile money is another feature currently being explored. The low
number of people willing to save money via mobile money has been due to the
lack of interest earned compared to other forms of savings. Thus, the chief
advantage of keeping savings in mobile money rather than in cash has been the
increased security associated with having the funds in mobile money (Zutt,
2010). Savings via mobile money are expected to grow especially since most
mobile networks are increasing mobile phone and bank collaborations that will
enable mobile phone savers to earn certain benefits like interests and loans on
savings. A good example is the Safaricom and Equity Bank introduction of a form
of account called M-Kesho that can be accessed via M-Pesa and pays an interest
on savings. Similar products include M-Shwari with is a product between M-Pesa
and Commercial Bank of Africa (CBA)
The
turn of the century has seen profound changes in the global economy. Services
have played a crucial part in these changes, because services are becoming the
way organizations meet with their markets (Irons, 1997:4) Already organizations
have discovered that their survival no longer exclusively depends on the
products they offer, but also on the additional offerings they make to their
customers that differentiate them from their competitors. Innovative
organizations, offering new services as well as unique customer services, are
now succeeding in markets where established organizations have failed (Lovelock
and Patterson, 1998:4). Manufacturing and technology industries recognized
services as a prerequisite to complement their products, in order to compete
successfully in the market place. Therefore it can be argued that, in most
industries, providing a service is no longer an option but a necessity.
Providing
a service is a people business. The interaction between customers and service
employees is vital for the actual success of service delivery. Rendering
excellent quality service depends very much on the way service employees
behave. In this regard, service competencies and service inclination contribute
towards the success of services (Kasper, van Helsdingen, deVries, 1999:513).
Customers are becoming more educated and demand not only quality products but
also high levels of services to accompany them. Service organizations therefore
need to adapt to customers’ views on services in order to assess whether the
services they provide are perceived by customers as better than those provided
by other service providers
(Kasper
et al., 1999:139).
A
wide variety of activities labeled as services are practiced by both
profit-orientated organizations and non-profit orientated organizations. The
success of these organizations depends on delivering excellent service quality
and creating value to customers (Kasper et al., 1999:13). Defining services is
therefore not a simplistic task. Over the years’ service marketing literature
has provided readers with an assortment of service definitions. According to
Irons, (1997:12) pure services are intangible but they do usually add value to,
or make available, a tangible product. They do not result in transfer of
ownership and may leave only memories.
Zeithaml
and Bitner (1996) claim that in the simplest terms services are deeds,
processes, and performances. Their broader definition states that services
include all economic activities whoseoutput is not a physical product, is
generally consumed at the time it is produced, and provides added value in
forms that are essentially intangible concerns of the purchaser.
Kotler
(1996) defines service as an activity that one party offers another that is
essential intangible and does not result in the ownership of anything. Its
production may or may not be tied to a physical product. GrΓΆnroos (1990)
identifies a service as an activity or series of activities of a more or less
intangible nature that normally, but not necessarily, takes place in
interaction between the customer and service employees and/or physical
resources or goods and/or systems of the service provider, which are provided
as solutions to customer problems.
The
conclusion derived from the above definition is that services deal with
intangible components. The purchase of services does not necessarily result in
physical transfer or ownership but still creates a bundle of benefits during or
after the service interaction or experience. Distinguishing between the
tangible and intangible components of a service is extremely difficult.
Therefore, separating the core service from the augmented service helps to
simplify this task. The core service represents the fundamental benefits the
service provide to satisfy customers’ needs. The augmented service incorporates
the core service in addition to the tangible elements and all additional
benefits of the service employed to satisfy customers’ needs. The core services
are mostly intangible because of their lack of physical attributes, while
augmented services provide the customer with the impression of the services’
tangibility component, because it can be seen, touched, and transferred to the
customer. Mostly the result of the service interaction is a product of a
tangible nature (Kasper et
al.,
1999:139; Palmer, 1994:127). The bundle of benefits is the customers’
expectations from the service. Customers experience positive consequences of
service processes as benefits, while negative consequences are experienced as
perceived risks. The bundle of benefits and the way the services are delivered
is aimed at creating customer satisfaction. In most service processes,
consumption and production of services take place at the same time. This
procedure requires interaction between the service provider and the customer to
complete the service process. The success of the service process is
subsequently dependent on the success of the interaction.
From
the above discussion Kasper et al., (1999:13) have constructed a broad
definition of service in which the relevant topics will be recognized: Services
are originally intangible and activities which are relatively quickly perishable
activities whose purchase takes place in an interaction process aimed at
creating customer satisfaction, but this interactive consumption does not
alwayslead to material possession. Over time, services and the service sector
have been defined in many different ways, which add to confusion and
disagreement when discussing services and service marketing. For the purpose of
this study, the above-mentioned broad definition of services will apply and it
will be acknowledged that there are very few pure services, in other words
totally intangible offerings.
In
today’s market place, companies focused on goods find that their core
competencies include service offerings. (Brown, 2000:10). Currently the two
largest service organizations, IBM and General Electric, arerecognized by most,
for their strong brand names. Before 1992, IBM services were strictly directed
at the support of IBM products. Today IBM regards services as a business in its
own right; therefore they use service offerings such as information technology
operations, systems integration, networking, consulting, and product support to
differentiate tem from their competitors. “Services are now the pumping heart
of IBM” (Brown, 2000:10)
However,
this transformation is not limited to the IT industry. Organizations in service
dominated industries such as insurance, health care, education and financial
services are focusing on their service offerings to differentiate them in the
marketplace. These organizations realize that by providing the customer with
specialized service offerings, they create a more strategic and deeper
relationship with their customers. The intimacy of this relationship helps them
to become the preferred provider.
In
summary services have become an integral part of the world economy. Over the
past decade the role of services marketing has become a dominant feature in the
service industry.
The
continuous shift to an information society lead to an increase in service
demand from customers, meaning that organizations no longer regard services as
an option but rather as a necessity to gain a competitive advantage.Broad
definition of services implies that it is originally intangible and relatively
quickly perishable activities whose buying takes place in a process of
interaction aimed at creating customer satisfaction, but during this
interactive consumption it does not always lead to material possession.
Services have five unique characteristics that are not founds in goods, namely
intangibility, inseparability, variability, perishability and ownership. The
intangibility characteristic of servicesseems to be the dominant one in the
definition of services. These unique characteristics create numerous challenges
for service marketers to attract new customers and retain current customers.The
service marketing triangle and the service mix are but two concepts used to
address the challenges of service marketing. The service marketing triangle
focus on three marketing processes that need to be successfully carried out to
ensure service success. Firstly, external marketing takes place between the
organization and the customers and represents the service promises the
organization makes to customers. Secondly, interactive marketing implies the
actual contact between service employees and customers and represent the
fulfillment of the promise made by the organization. Thirdly, internal
marketing enables the service marketer to deliver promises made to customers
and is the result of interaction between the organization and its employees.
The service mix concept has been developed because of the limitation of the
traditional marketing mix components in their application to services.
The
components of the service mix are; service offerings, price, and distribution,
promotions, people, process and physical evidence. The three new components of
the service mix, i.e., people, process and physical evidence, have the
advantage that they can be fully controlled by the organization.
The
success of services relies on the success of the interaction between service
providers and customers. Customers perceive services in terms of service
quality, customer satisfaction and value. Very few organizations have succeeded
without taking customer needs into consideration. Individual customers have
individual expectations of services. From the customers’ point of view the
interaction with the service provider is the most vivid impression they have of
the service quality, therefore the initial interaction of customers with the
service employees can be critical for the organization in any repeat purchase
and in achieving a reputation for superior quality.Customers consider
reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangibles as the most
essential dimensions in their assessment of service quality. Customer satisfaction
includes service quality, product quality, and price. Customer satisfaction
cannot be determined without an actual experience with the organization. The
customers’ perception of value relates to the benefits received from the
offering in term of money, time, and effort. Service organizations are
dependent on service employees and it is, therefore, imperative that they
recruit, train, supportandretain good service employees. Service employees must
have the skills, abilities, and attitude to provide customers with quality
service.Service organizations realize the importance of the role that service
employees play in the success of the service process. Therefore, it is
important that they understand the value employees add to an organization.
2.2.3 Technology
Dahlberg T. , N. Mallat, (2007), Internet and
mobile technology have become a part of everyday life for some in the emerging
and developing world. Cell phones, in particular, are almost omnipresent in
many nations. People around the world are using their cell phones for a variety
of purposes, especially for calling, texting and taking pictures, while smaller
numbers also use their phones to get political, consumer and health information
Mobile
technologies are changing economic life in developing countries, wheremany
people are using cell phones for a range of financial transactions, such
asreceiving and sending money transfers. Indeed, mobile money is already
beingused by banks and mobile network operators to provide millions of
unbankedconsumers a way to store and access money digitally. The limited
informationavailable suggests that for millions of consumers in developing
countries,mobile money is transforming lives by providing access to financial
servicesand the ability to pay and be paid electronically—sometimes for the
firsttime in their lives. Mobile financial services, known as “mobile money”,
allowunbanked people to use their phones as a bank account: to deposit,
withdrawand transfer money with their handset. People can also use mobile
systems topay utility bills and pay for goods in merchant shops.
Sarma (2007 and 2008) observes that Operator-Centric Model: The mobile operator acts
independently to deploy mobile payment service. The operator could provide an
independent mobile wallet from the user mobile account(airtime). A large
deployment of the Operator-Centric Model is severely challenged by the lack of
connection to existing payment networks. Mobile network operator should handle
the interfacing with the banking network to provide advanced mobile payment
service in banked and under banked environment. Pilots using this model have
been launched in emerging countries but they did not cover most of the mobile
payment service use cases. Payments were limited to remittance and airtime top
up.
Bank-Centric Model: A bank deploys mobile payment applications or devices to
customers and ensures merchants have the required point-of-sale (POS)
acceptance capability. Mobile network operator are used as a simple carrier,
they bring their experience to provide Quality of service (QOS) assurance.
Collaboration Model: This model involves collaboration among banks, mobile
operators and a trusted third party.
Peer-to-Peer Model: The mobile payment service provider acts independently
from financial institutions and mobile network operators to provide mobile
payment. For example, the MHITS SMS payment service uses a peer-to-peer model.
The
M-Pesa case in Kenya according to a 2006 survey by FinAccess, only 27% of the
population of Kenya has a banking account, half of the population owns a
mobile-phone Safaricomthe local branch ofVodafone operate the mobile network
managingM-Pesa in Kenya. In this context an Operator Centric m-payment model
has been implemented every time a user makes a transfer, he pays a fee to the
operator, depending on the amount ofthe transfer. The receiver is not obliged
to be registered with M-Pesa, but the transferwill be slightly cheaper if he
is. Users tend to consider this new system as a new way toaccess to banking and
financial services. For this reason, theM-Pesa system is currently a great
success because the transfers are almost instantaneous, simple and secure.
According to Leeladhar (2005),M-Pesa information is stored in the
SIM card which is theproperty of the operator. Itthen depends on the location
of the secure element whichdetermines the operator centric" nature of this
model. The nature and brand of themobile is not of importance. The SIM card of
each customer must beSafaricominKenya(orVodacomin Tanzania): this is the only
necessary condition to participate to thepayment system in the best conditions
(to have both the possibility to pay and to bepaid). Users open accounts near a
certified agent. They pay this agent in cash; thecertified agent creates as a
counterpart an amount of virtual M-Pesa. At all moment,the same certified agent
realizes also the conversion of virtual currency in cash and payback the agents
at the end of their transactions. Fees and transaction costs are paid to the
certified agent when a new account is opened or closed. Registration is free
but eachtransaction is submitted to the payment of fixed fees to the operator.
2.2.4 Price
Price has been observed as an important element
affecting the diffusion of new products and services, but pricing of a new
product or service is particularly difficult (Foxall, 1995). To enable accurate
pricing decisions for new products or services, a detailed knowledge on the
potential customers’ perceptions and characteristics is needed. However, though
it is known that price is an integral part of diffusion enhancement activities,
we have a very limited knowledge on its actual effects on the diffusion of
mobile services. It is also more or less unknown how customers of mobile
services perceive the charged prices and what are the dynamics affecting to
price perceptions. The perceived price is formed from the bases of a customer’s
experience about mobile services and in comparison to prices of other optional
service delivery channels.
Further challenges for pricing of mobile services
is brought by the fast evolving new wireless technologies and business
practices. In this new service environment traditional pricing strategies have
brought unsatisfactory results, a need to develop pricing has generated. For
that purpose it is necessary to study the customers’ subjective price
perceptions to enable the creation of more effective pricing schemes. At an aggregated level, price
sensitivity is often used as a synonym for price elasticity (Link, 1997) and
thus also in thisstudy these two terms are seen to as synonyms. Sensitivity
ofdemand refers to how volume-sensitive a product or a serviceis to price
changes. Sensitivity represents a valuable strategictool in pricing (Tucker,
1966).Price sensitivity on the individual adopter level appears tobe equivalent
to the concept of price consciousness for apotential buyer of any product.
Price consciousness has beendefined as the degree to which he or she is
unwilling to pay a high price for a productand willing to refrain from buying a
product whose price is unacceptablyhigh (Monroe, 1990).Price consciousness is
related to the price acceptability level aswell as to the width of latitude of
price acceptability(Lichtensteinet al., 1988). Individuals, who are price
conscious, are generally not willing to pay high prices forthe product in
question. Furthermore, the range of acceptableprices is relatively narrow for
price conscious individuals(Link, 1997).In studies on price sensitivity in
telecommunicationindustry three different consumer segments have beenidentified
(e.g. Kollmann, 2000). It has been found that inboth ends of pricing (high-end
versus low-end) the pricesensitivity is substantially lower, in other words
insensitive.Influencing on these two market segments with pricing wouldbe most
probably ineffective. Thus, for these marketsegmentsit would be most effective
to pursue quality-focusedmarketing strategies (e.g. improvement of
service/speechquality).
Price
perceptionis the process by which people select, organize,and interpret
information to form a meaningful picture of theworld. Although Nagle and Holden
(2002) believe that pricemerely represents the monetary value a buyer must give
to aseller as part of a purchase agreement, we go on suggestingthat customer’s
price perception is closely related on herperception of quality, value and
other beliefs. The work onprice perceptions and adoption of innovations has
produced alarge number of contradicting research findings. Related toprice
perceptions, Goldsmith and Newell (1997) foundshopping innovators to be less
price sensitive than laggardswhereasKorgaonkarandSmith (1986) reported
noassociations between purchase behavior and priceconsciousness. However,
earlier Korgaonkar (1984) hadconcluded that non-store shopping would be most
appealingto price oriented individuals. Along with consumer attitudes and
shopping orientation,there has been significant weight given to price
perceptions ofconsumers, and its impact on the adoption of product andservice
innovations. This body of work on price perceptionsand adoption of innovations
has produced significantlydiffering findings. Related to price perceptions,
Goldsmithand Newell (1997) found shopping innovators to be less pricesensitive
than later buyers, whereas Korgaonkar and Smith(1986) reported no associations
between purchase behavior and price consciousness. However, earlier
Korgaonkar(1984)had concluded that non-store shopping would be mostappealing to
price oriented individuals..
A
consumer’s level of knowledge about price and pricesensitivity of any given
product or service may be influenced by Demographiccharacteristics such as age,
income, and gender are oftenassumed to affect one’s level price sensitivity and
priceperception, and are therefore frequently used as the basis
formarketsegmentation.Lack of demographically-driven differences in
priceknowledge may be due to the equal ability of the variousdemographic groups
in processing product-relatedinformation (e.g. Meyer-Levy and Sternthal, 1991).
Alternative explanation might be that the limited incentivesgiven to
respondents, and the demographically homogeneoussamples used in previous
studies, may have led to theobserved null effects of demographics (Estelami,
1998).Therefore, the role of demographics on price knowledge andprice
sensitivity remains open for further empirical inquiry.While high exposure to
price information may result inmore precise knowledge on prices, a high level
of variability inprices may lead to low quality knowledge. Such variability
canbe introduced due to significant product differentiation effortsby sellers,
and perceived or actual product/service quality variations. (Estelami, 1998) It
is therefore anticipated thatacross service/product categories, significant
variations inconsumers’ sensitivity of prices exist.
Customers’
price sensitivity is also influenced by intermediaryservices available online
and offline. Two intermediary factorsare likely to affect the degree of price
sensitivity: price comparison using intermediary; and price bundling.If
customers use intermediaries, which provide comparative prices of competitors,
their price sensitivity could increase.Comparative prices increase the salience
of price as a decisioncriterion and reduce the costs of price search. Although
pricecomparison tends to increase price sensitivity, this effect islikely to be
lower online than offline. Comparative pricesprovide reference prices for
customers. When the search costsare low, as in the online environment they are,
the referenceprices have little effect on price search tendency (Urbanyet
al.1988).
Product
bundles are typically offered by intermediaries andoften involve savings on
individual items. If customers’choosefrom a product bundle, they may focus more
on the value ofthe bundle and less on prices of individual components. Thisis
because the value of the bundle has a strong impact oncustomers’ perceptions of
transaction value (YadovandMonroe, 1993). To this extent, bundles may
lowerimportance of price. Customers also typically use
the“psychophysics-of-price” heuristic in that they perceive theexpected savings
from price search in relative terms ratherthan in absolute amounts (Grewall and
Marmorstein, 1994).Because the value of a bundle is higher than that of
acomponent, customers expect higher absolute savings on abundle than on its
components. Because the savings on thecomponent are smaller than the savings on
the bundle as awhole, customers attach less importance to price and are
lesslikely to search for better prices for the component.Therefore, we expect
the online medium to intensify thetendency of price bundling to decrease price
sensitivity.
Pricing
is one of the most important marketing mix decisions, price being the only
marketing mix variable that generates revenues. Pricing is not a single
concept, but a multidimensional one with different meanings and implications
for the manufacturer, the middleman and the end-customer. Pricing strategy is
of great importance because it affects both revenue and buyer behavior. The
whole pricing environment is therefore considered, first from the point of view
of the company and its strategies and then from the aspect of the consumer.
However, it must not be forgotten that there are other, external influences on
pricing - not just a firm’s competitors but also from government and
legislation. Once these factors have been taken into account, various pricing
strategies are reviewed and some attention is given to how best to implement
those strategies; how pricing levels can be adjusted and how such tactics do
affect buyer behavior and company revenue.Klompmaker, J.E., Rodgers, W.H. and
Nygren, A.E. (2003). The multidimensional character of price should be taken
into account for the pricing of products and services. Pricing involves the
determination (and adjustment) of a price structure and price levels, as well
as decisions on short-term price changes. A more effective, goal-oriented
approach to pricing is needed that explicitly takes into account the role of
price as a marketing mix instrument and as a profit generator. This provides a
framework for effective, goal-oriented pricing, and to highlight the major
aspects and factors of the pricing decision.
A
key parameter affecting pricing decisions is essentially customer based. The
upper limit to the price to be charged is set by the market - unless, of
course, the customer must purchase the product and we are the sole supplier.
Effectively, then, at least in competitive markets, demand, i.e. the price
which customers are both willing and able to pay, is a major consideration in
the selection of pricing strategies and levels. Ideally, the marketing manager
needs to know the demand schedule for the products and services to be priced.
This means that we must take into consideration the time factor, i.e. demand
must be specified for a given time period. For example, it is conventional to
distinguish between “short”, “medium” and “long run” time horizons when discussing
demand. Certainly demand can, and does, vary over these different time periods.
The time period must be explicit when evaluating demand concepts in the context
of marketing.Demand for a product or service, and indeed the price the customer
is willing to pay, is related to the attributes of competitive products being
offered. Demand for a product is therefore closelyrelated to how the customer
perceives the various attributes of competitive products. These attributes
include physical/tangible attributes of the product or service in question: for
example, quality features, packaging etc., and “intangible “attributes, such as
brand/corporate image and status. So far, we have emphasized the complexity of
consumer reactions toward prices, and the psychological factors affecting the
role of price in the decision process. An even more important observation is
the enormous heterogeneity in price reactions among potential buyers. This
heterogeneity is already apparent at the level of price awareness and knowledge.
In addition, consumers may evaluate prices differently, because they are more
or less informed about prevailing prices and product characteristics. Decision
makers should recognize these differences, and positively “exploit” consumer
heterogeneity in the development of pricing strategies and tactics.
Simon,
H. and Butscher, S.A. (2001). The pricing strategy will not only depend on
consumer response, but also on the reaction of competitors. Competitive
behavior varies considerably with market structure, intensity of competition,
and the existence and nature of significant competitive advantages.
Competitors’ prices are therefore more decisive for own pricing decisions in
markets with many undifferentiated competitors. Market structure and intensity
of competition change over the product life-cycle (PLC) as new competitors
enter the market and products become more homogeneous. Competition intensifies
in most cases, and becomes especially severe in the maturity and decline stage,
because sales growth can now only be accomplished at the expense of the
competitors’ sales volume. Intense competition implies an increased likelihood
of competitive reactions to pricing decisions (adjustments in price and/or
other marketing mix variables). Besides market structure, the distribution of
market shares, the sources and types of competitive advantages and the
marketing goals and strategies of competitors affect the likelihood and nature
of competitive reactions. Competitive retaliation may attenuate pricing
effects, and sometimes provoke real price wars (prices are continually reduced,
even to unprofitable levels). The analysis of competitive behavior is therefore
a prerequisite for effective pricing.
Unique
product value results from (tangible or intangible) product characteristics
that are valued by consumers and differentiate the product from its
substitutes. Unique product value reduces the price sensitivity of consumers,
thereby enabling the firm to set prices above the competitors’level without
experiencing a considerable decrease in demand. This is an example of M-Pesa by
Safaricom, statistics indicate that their mobile money transactions are
slightly higher than the competitors but by the virtue of consumer confidence
it remains the market leader in mobile money.In addition to customers and
competitors, a number of other publics influence pricing decisions. The most
important is government (legal constraints). Other individuals, groups or
institutions may also have an impact on the pricing decision (e.g. financial institutions,
workforce) but they are not discussed here. A number of government laws set
legal constraints to competitive pricing behavior, consumer pricing,
international pricing and (the control over) retailer pricing. Prohibited or
restricted competitive pricing practices are price fixing, price
discrimination, and predatory pricing. Important legal constraints on consumer
pricing are regulations against deceptive pricing and consumer price
discrimination. Moreover, in specific product categories like pharmaceuticals,
or bread, governments exert direct price controls and establish ranges of
legally acceptable consumer prices.
Pricing
decision is only one part of the general marketing strategy. Pricing decision
must therefore be integrated with the other Ps of the global marketing mix.
Price is the only area of the marketing mix where policy can be changed rapidly
without large direct cost implications. However, this characteristic also
results in the danger that pricing action may be resorted to be as a quick fix
instead of changes being made in accordance with the other elements of the
overall international marketing strategy. It is thus important that management
realizes that constant fine-tuning of prices in international markets should be
avoided, and that many problems are not best addressed with pricing action. In
addition to broader corporate objectives, pricing decisions must also reflect
and support specific marketing strategies. In particular, pricing strategies
need to be in line with market targeting and positioning strategies.Clearly, if
a company produces a high quality product or service aimed at the top end of
the market, with a prestige image, it would not make much sense (indeed it
would probably be a major mistake) to set a low price on the price on the
product even it cost efficiency allowed this. Pricing therefore must be
consistent with the other elements of the marketing mix and the selected
positioning strategy.
Pricing strategiesdetermine
long-term price structure and price levels, and their evolution over time in
response to long-term changes in the environment; while pricing tacticsconsist of short-term price decisions (mostly
price reductions from the normal or long-term level) to induce immediate sales
increases or to respond to short-term changes in the environment.
Hanlon,
D. and Luery, D (2002). The service providers of mobile money use the
measurement of sales promotion effects have generated a great deal of interest
in recent years. While a variety of promotional activities is available, the
bulk of sales promotion actions take the form of either a straight price cut,
or a more indirect price reduction. Typical of such price promotions is their
temporary character; a large portion of the observed sales increase stems from
brand switching. All in all, temporary price reductions have about the weakest
positive long-term effects of any below the line activity since they appeal to
rational (financial) arguments rather than building brand image or franchise.
While
the evidence on positive long run implications on brand sales is limited, there
are indications that price deals lead to purchase acceleration and stock
building, followed by sales dips in the post-promotion period. In other words,
sales promotions may partly “borrow sales from the future”. More importantly,
frequent price cuts may reduce the consumer's willingness to buy the product at
the regular price eventually damage product image.
A
whole set of complex factors affect pricing decisions, making this in fact one
of the most complex and difficult areas of market planning. Pricing decisions
are more than just a “mechanical” exercise of adding margins for profit on to
costs. Price setting must become an integral part of the marketing strategy of
the company and must be consistent with corporate and marketing objectives and
other elements of the mix. In addition to these inputs to pricing decisions,
the marketer must also consider demand, cost and competitors.Based on the
environmental factors (customers, competitors and publics) and general
marketing strategy.
2.3 Critical Literature Review
As noted
earlier, Mobile banking (m-banking) is a subset of branchless banking and
involves access to a range of banking services through mobile telephony. One of
its main advantages is that it addresses the cost of outreach and the cost of
handling low-value transactions by using agents instead of banks. M-banking
channels are primarily used for transfers and payments, even when they offer a
broader range of services.
The
development of m-banking has so far been driven not only by mobile network
operators (MNOs) but also to some extent by some large banks. Mobile money
transfer plays a major role in the overall banking sector. An illustrative
example is M-Pesa that started as a pilot in 2005 between Safaricom and the
microfinance institution (MFI) Faulu Kenya to facilitate microfinance loan
disbursement and repayments. Safaricom learned how customers used the service
beyond loan repayments and, as a result of the pilot, launched M-Pesa, which is
today's most successful m-payment service worldwide.
Countries
with a low banking infrastructure and a high percentage of rural population,
financial institutions consider mobile money transfer as one way to promote
financial inclusion. Mobile money transfer allow for collection and
disbursement of cash in a safe and timely manner.
However, no prior analysis had been
done concerning the practicability of the viability of mobile money transfer as
put forward by the initial adopters of mobile money transfer. Some parameters
like social factors such as security and customer acceptability were ignored or
immeasurable by then.
2.4
Summary
When customers decide to buy a service to meet an unfulfilled need,
they weigh options posed by various mobile phone money transfer providers. To
stay in business today, the product/service provider must give back to the
customer as much as he receives from him/her. Customers are more educated and
informed than ever, and they have the tools to verify the company’s claims and seek
out superior alternatives. This has a major influence on the choices they make.
Customers estimate which offer will deliver the most perceived act on it;
whether or not the expectation affects customer’s satisfaction and the
probability that he or she will purchase the product again. This study
therefore sought to determine the factors that determine the customer’s choice
of mobile money transfer services.
2.4.1
Mobile banking
Recent
literature has a narrow focus and ignores mobile money transfer parameters
almost entirely; it equates this service with the substitution of currency with
communication gadget. For instance Santomero and Seater (1996), and Shy and
Tarkka (2002) present models that identify conditions under which alternative
payments substitute for currency. Most of these models indicate that there is
at least a possibility for mobile money substitutes for currency to emerge and
flourish on a wide scale depending on the characteristics of the various
technology and those of the potential users.
Also, the
enormous investments and seemingly incomprehensible valuations of mobile
banking services particularly the upcoming financial institutions are scarily
reminiscent of the dotcom boom of the 1990s. This has led to warnings that this
is a new tech bubble waiting to (Burst Business insider
Jan 2014).
As noted
earlier however, the research on the rate of adoption of mobile money transfer
services by the consumers has been vast, while there has been very limited
research on the general impacts of these services on the public and private
finance efficiency of cost cut, reliability and consumer utility levels.
Figure 2.5 Conceptual Framework
Independent Variables
Dependent
Source: Author (2016)
Interpretation
of Variables
2.5.1
Competition
Competition produces positive self-esteem between the competitive
parties. The fair competition between the competitors ensures that the
competitor’s rights are respected.
2.5.2
Services
A service is an economic activity where an immaterial exchange of value
occurs. You have to know how to deliver quality services to customers so as to
satisfy them fully. The service should be simple and fast.
2.5.3
Prices
Price of the service is one of the factors that affects the mobile
money services ie. withdrawal costs affect the sustainability of competition.
This being the key factor it should be well handled since it can act as a
determinant of how the beneficiaries of the services will respond.
2.5.4
Technology
Superior technology is important in guiding the mobile money transfer
service users when choosing between otherwise seemingly similar service
providers. Poor technology leads to delays in mobile money transfer services
such as sending and receiving money.
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
3.1
Introduction
A research methodology guides the
researcher in collecting, analyzing and interpreting observed facts (Bless and
Achola, 1988). This chapter introduces the logical framework to be followed in
the process of conducting the study. It is divided into: research design,
population and sample, data collection and data analysis.
3.2
Research Design
Based on the purpose of this study and
the type of data involved, descriptive and qualitative research designs were
used. The goal was to provide a clear understanding of mobile money transfer
services as it relates to consumer choice, and its impact on general financial
actors. Qualitative technique was used to collect data from the managers,
subordinate staff as well as from customers.
This was to ensure convenience in data
collection and an easier way to deduce relationships between the findings and
the hypothesized objectives.
3.3
Target population
Cooper and Emory (1995) define population as the total collection
of elements about which the researcher wishes to make some inferences. The
population of interest in this study consisted of three mobile money transfer
services offered in Thika Kenya. The mobile money agents, managers, employees
and customers were targeted as the key respondents. There was a need to sample
the population because not all the population elements use mobile banking. The
study therefore used stratified sampling.
Table 3.1 Target Population
Category
|
Number of People
|
% Represented
|
Safaricom
M-Pesa
|
60
|
50
|
Airtel
Money
|
45
|
37
|
Yu-
Cash
|
15
|
13
|
Total
|
120
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
3.4 Sample design
Purposive sampling design was used. This was to ensure validity of
data and save time and other resources .Questionnaires were only distributed to
the most relevant population.
Table 3.2 Sample Size
Category
|
No. of People
|
Sample Size
|
Percentage %
|
Safaricom
M-Pesa
|
50
|
20
|
42
|
Airtel
Money
|
40
|
15
|
34
|
Yu-
Cash
|
30
|
10
|
24
|
Total
|
120
|
45
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
3.5 Data
Collection instruments
Primary sources were used in data
collection. Open and close-ended questionnaires alongside with one on one
interview wereconducted to target respondents.In total two questionnaires
weredelivered, one to managers and employees and another to customers. This
instrument allowed for cost and time savings for the respondents as well as the
researchers.
3.5.1
Validity and reliability of data collection instruments
The researcher obtained written permission to enable him
collect research data from different MMTS. The researcher then proceeded to the
field for the data collection exercise. The researcher used stratified random
sampling technique to identify their sample. The researcher approached the
mobile phone users who were issued with questionnaires and returned after
duration of two weeks. The questionnaires were both closed and open ended
questions. The open ended questions helped in expounding responses to some
closed ended questions that were asked to help give a wider perspective of the
issue being addressed by the specific question.
3.6
Data Analysis
For
the purpose of establishing important and objective information, all relevant
methods were employed where necessary in line with the objective of the study.
The questionnaires were received and edited for accuracy, competence,
uniformity, consistence and acceptability. Errors and omissions detected were
corrected. The data collected was edited, coded, tabulated, and interpreted in
relation to the research objectives. The analysis of quantitative data was
carried out using excel computer package and presented inform of tables, graphs
and pie charts and qualitative data was analyzed using word package.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION AND
INTERPRETATION OF FINDINGS
4.1 Introduction
In
this chapter the researcher carries out an analysis of data using both
quantitative and qualitative methods. The analysis process is done on the basis
of the variables of the research objectives. The analysis and interpretation of
data is done by the help of analyzed tools such as graphs, pie charts and
through judgment due to observations made.
4.2 Presentation of Findings
4.2.1 Response Rate
Table 4.1 Response Rate
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Response
|
40
|
88.89
|
Non Response
|
5
|
12.11
|
Total
|
45
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.1 Response Rate
Source: Author (2014)
The response rate was the actual representation of the population.
Out of 45 questionnaires distributed 40vwere returned, that is 88.89% of the
total population and only 5 which is 11.11% was not returned.
4.2.2 Gender Analysis
Table 4.2 GenderAnalysis
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Male
|
22
|
55
|
Female
|
18
|
45
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.2 Gender Analysis
Source: Author (2014)
Analysis from the above
table & figure shows that 55% of the respondents were male while 45% were
female. This can be interpreted that majority of the respondents were male in
the mobile money transfer industry and their customers.
4.2.3 Respondents
Category
Table 4.3 Respondents
Category
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Customers
|
13
|
30
|
Mobile money transfer operators
|
18
|
45
|
Mobile money transfer owners
|
10
|
25
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.3 Respondents Category
Source: Author (2016)
Table 4.3 and figure 4.3
indicate the response of the category of persons who filled the questionnaires.
Mobile money transfer customers
responded by 30%, mobile money operators 45 % and mobile money transfers
owners responded with 25 % This can be
interpreted that majority of the respondents were mobile money transfer
operators staff followed by mobile money
transfer customers and finally mobile
money transfer owners.
4.2.4 Age Group
Table 4.4 Age Group
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
18-25 years
|
21
|
52.5
|
26 – 35 years
|
10
|
25
|
36 – 50 years
|
6
|
15
|
Above 51 years
|
3
|
7.5
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.4 Age Group
Source: Author (2016)
Table 4.4 and figure 4.4
above indicate the analysis of age group. 52.5% were aged between 18-25years, 25%
were aged between 26-35 years, 15% 36 – 50 years, and finally above 51 years
were 7.5%. It can be interpreted that the biggest age group was between 18-25
years who were actively involved in the research.
4.2.5 Highest level of Education
Table 4.5 Highest level of Education
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Secondary
|
20
|
50
|
College
|
12
|
30
|
University
|
8
|
20
|
Post Graduate
|
0
|
0
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.5 Highest level of Education
Source: Author (2016)
Many of the respondents,
that is50% were secondary school graduates. 30% of respondents had college
education while 20% had graduate education (University). 0% of respondents were
post graduates. This indicates therefore that most of the respondents were
literate and were well informed of the variables being tested in the
questionnaires .They had background information on the mobile money transfer
industry.
4.2.6 Length of time using mobile money transfer services
Table 4.6 Length of time using mobile money transfer services
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Less than 5 years
|
12
|
30
|
6-10 Years
|
26
|
65
|
Over 10 Years
|
2
|
5
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.6 Length of time using mobile money transfer services
Source Author 2016
4.2.7 Competition
Table 4.7Whethercompetition determines customers’ choice of mobile money transfer
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Yes
|
28
|
70
|
No
|
12
|
30
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.7 Whethercompetition influences customers’ choice of mobile money transfer
provider
Source: Author (2016)
Analysis from the table
4.15 and figure 4.15 above indicates that 70% of the respondents agreed
that competition affects choice of
mobile money transfer service while 30 % of the respondents felt that competition does not to a great
extent affect choice of mobile money transfer service provider.
4.2.8 Competition
Table 4.8 Rating of competition effect on choice of
mobile money transfer service
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Very good
|
26
|
65
|
Fair
|
10
|
25
|
Poor
|
4
|
10
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.8 Rating of competition effect on choice of
mobile money transfer service
Source: Source: Author (2016)
From table 4.16 on rating of competition on mobile money transfer
service, it can be deducted that completion has a good ratings by respondents
as having effect on mobile money transfer service. 65% of the respondents said
that it had very good ratings while 25% felt that competition has fair rate on
influence of customers.
Only 10% felt that competition had poor ratings on customer’s
choice of mobile money transfer service.
Hence companies need to compete amongst themselves so that
customers can get better options of products
4.2.9 Services offered
Table 4.9 whether
service offered determines the choice of mobile money transfer service
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Yes
|
30
|
75
|
No
|
10
|
25
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.9 whether
service offered determines the choice of mobile money transfer service
Source: Author (2016)
Majority of the respondents felt that service offered determines
the choice of mobile money transfer service 75% while 25 % felt that service
offered did not determine the choice.
4.2.10 Frequency use of mobile money transfer services
Table 4.10 Rating Frequency use of mobile money transfer services
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Regularly
|
38
|
95
|
Rarely
|
2
|
5
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.10 Frequency use of mobile money
transfer services
Source: Author (2016)
Table 4.9 and figure
4.10 indicate the frequency use of mobile money transfer services. In the
analysis, 95% of the respondents agreed that they regularly use the mobile money
transfer services while 5% do not use the mobile money transfer services
regularly. This represented only a small percentage of the population.
Table 4.11 Preferred mobile money service provider
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Mpesa
|
34
|
85
|
Airtel Money
|
4
|
10
|
Yu Money
|
2
|
5
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
(Source Author 2016)
(Source Author 2016)
Figure 4.11 Preferred mobile money
service provider (Above)
85% of respondents use Mpesa as their mobile money transfer service
while 10% preferred using Airtel money while 5 % preferred Yu money as their
mobile money transfer service.
From this data it is evident that Mpesa was the most preferred
mobile money transfer service in Thika town.
4.2.11 Pricing
Table 4.12 whetherprice determine
customers’ choice of mobile money transfer service
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Yes
|
4
|
10
|
No
|
36
|
90
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.12 whether pricing of
products Effects customer’s choice of Mobile money transfer
Source: Author (2016)
From the above table
4.11 and figure 4.12, 90% of respondent, indicated that pricing does not
affects the choice while making mobile money transfer service while 10%
indicated that pricing does affect affects the choice of mobile money transfer
service provider . It can be interpreted that majority of the respondents
agreed that pricing considerations does not affect the choice of mobile money
transfer service provider.
Table 4.13Extent price determines customer’s choice of mobile
money transfer services
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Very great extent
|
2
|
5
|
great extent
|
8
|
20
|
Low extent
|
20
|
50
|
Not at all
|
10
|
25
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.13 The extent price determines customer’s choice of
mobile money transfer services
Source: Author (2016)
Fromthe above table majority of the respondents 50% said that
price has a low extent on the determination of mobile money transfer service
followed 25% who felt price does not at all determine the choice of mobile
money transfer service. 20% felt that price has a great extent on the
customer’s choice of mobile money transfer service.
Only 5% of the respondents felt that price has a great extent in
determining the choice of mobile money transfer service. This can be interpreted
that price does not affect the choice of mobile money transfer service and
mobile money transfer service providers should concentrate on the other factors
influencing their customer’s choice
4.2.12 Technology
Table 4.14Whethertechnology determines customers’ choice of mobile money transfer
provider
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Yes
|
21
|
52%
|
No
|
19
|
48%
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.14 Whether Technology determines the customers’ choice of mobile money
transfer
From the above findings 52% of the
respondents felt that technology determines the customers’ choice of mobile money transfer
service while 48% felt that technology does not determine the choice of mobile
money transfer provider.
Table 4.15The extent that technology determines the choice of
mobile money transfer service.
Category
|
Frequency
|
Percentage
|
Large extent
|
26
|
65
|
Moderate extent
|
10
|
25
|
Low extent
|
4
|
10
|
Total
|
40
|
100
|
Source: Author (2016)
Figure 4.15 Rating of technology
determination on customer’s choice of Mobile money transfer services
Source: Source: Author (2016)
From the table 4.8 and
figure 4.8 above majority of respondents indicated that technology determines
the choice of mobile money transfer service. This was represented by 65% who
indicated large extent, 25% moderate extent while 10% indicated that it
affected by low extent. It can thus be interpreted that majority agreed that
technology determines the choice of mobile money services by a very large
extent.
4.3 Summary of Data Analysis
4.3.1 General Information
Out of 45 questionnaires distributed 40 were returned, that is 88.89%
of the total population and only 5 which is 11.11 % were not returned. Analysis
shows that 56% of the respondents were male while 44% were female. This can be
interpreted that majority of the respondents were male. Respondent’s category
was represented by mobile money customers 34% mobile money operators and
employees 45% while owners and agents represented the remaining21% this shows
that all stakeholders were well represented and all categories responded . Majority
of the respondents 50% were secondary school graduates while 34% of the
respondents were college graduates. 16% of respondents had university
education. Age group of the respondents based on the analysis found that 52 %
were aged between 18-25years, 22%% were aged between 26-35years, 19% were aged
between 36-50years, and finally above 51 years had 7%.
4.3.1
Competition
The views of many respondents were that competition determines the
customers’ choice of Mobile Money Transfer Services (MMTS) in order to help the
service provider to improve their services. This was indicated by 68% who
agreed that it does determine while 32% of them disagreed. Most of the
customers are drawn by the product that is actively in competition. This is in
terms of advertisements and discounts.
4.3.2
Services
The costs of
gaining new customers are much higher than the costs of maintaining the
existing ones. Hence customers consider that to be able to maintain them the
mobile money sector should always consider the quality of the services they
offer to their customers. From the data that was collected it was noted that
services are greatly used to enhance the relationship between the user and the
service provider of the service. This was indicated by
the response of 74% for those who agreed that services offered determines the
choice of MMTS while 26% of them indicated that they disagree.
4.3.3Prices
According to the findings of the research that was conducted, price of the
service that is provided was not one of the factors that determine the
customer’s choice of MMTS, the price of the service remains irrelevant provided
the quality of the service provided is not compromised. This was indicated by the response of 89% for those
who agreed that price of the services provided does not determine the choice of
MMTS while 11% of them indicated that they agree that it affects. Hence the mobile money service providers should keep in consideration
other factors rather just think of offering the services at a lower cost.
4.3.4
Technology
The views of many respondents was
that most of them were preferring technology
to be used as a good mode to advertise, their services and also to reach
further and deeper areas. Hence technology was one of the factors that affect
the MMTS. This was indicated by the response of 52% for those
who agreed while 48% of them indicated that they disagreed. Due to this MMTS providersshould strive towards
attaining cooperation and promotion to their image. This makes the users of the
service to have full confidence of using their services. They can also promote
their service through the media which many users of the service can afford to
fit all people in the society. The technology employed in the mobile money
transfer is important not only to safe guard customer’s wealth and secrets but
also to ensure customers have a responsive system.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Introduction
This
chapter summarizes, discusses and makes conclusions on the findings of this
study in relation to the objectives put forward in chapter one. It also
discusses the recommendations for further research as well as recommendations
for policy and practice.
5.2
Summary of findings:
5.2
.1 How does competition determine customers choice of mobile money transfer?
From the study it was noted that competition does affect the mobile money
transfer in the mobile money industry. From the findings a response of 67%
indicated very good effects, 23% indicated fair effects while 10% indicated
poor effects. On the question above, the researcher found out that the higher the competitive a
service provider is, the higher the customer approval and therefore competition
determines the customer’s choice of mobile money transfer service provider.
5.2.2
How does the provision of quality services influence customer’s choice of mobile
money transfer services?
The researcher identified that the
respondents frequently used M-pesa, the mobile money transfer services provided
by safaricom represented 85%, those who enjoyed the Airtel money services were
10% , while those who used the Yu Money represented 5%. Relating this to the
data already collected and analyzed, the researcher observed that there is a
positive relationship between mobile money service provider distribution and
customers’ choice of the service. Hence services provided by a service provider
affect its approval. The better the service the higher the approval.
5.2.3
How does offering good prices determine the customers’ choice of mobile money
transfer services ?
The researcher identified that the
respondents rated price as a factor that does not affect the mobile money
transfer service. 59% represented those who believe that price affects the MMTS
at a low extent, 19% believed that it does not affect at all, 18% believe it
affects at a great extent, whereas 4% believe it affects at a very great
extent.
The researcher observed that
SafaricomMpesa service charges are relatively higher than that of other mobile
money service providers. SafaricomMpesa charges its customers higher when they
are transferring money. This is not the case for other mobile money service
providers.
From the theory of demand and
supply, it is expect that demand of M-pesa be lower relative to other service
providers ceteris paribus. Hence the researcher concluded that
the level of pricing does not affect the customer’s approval and therefore
pricing does not affect the customers’ choice of mobile money transfer service.
5.2.4
What is the effect of technology in determining the customer’s choice of mobile
money transfer services?
The
researcher identified that the respondents rated technology large extent which
was represented by 65%, moderate extent 25% and low extent at 10%. All mobile
money service providers had a level working in terms of gadgets that their
services supported. Hence the researcher concluded that
the better the technology, the higher the customer approval and therefore
technology affects the customers’ choice of mobile money transfer service.
5.3
Conclusions
The
researcher concluded that if the service providers are to achieve competitive
advantage among each other, they will have to improve technology and
competition in order to improve their performance. According to the research
the level of education plays a vital role therefore since they also need to
educate those people on importance of using the mobile money transfer services
appropriately. The researcher also concluded that the organizations should also
use services as it is a very good weapon to fight for relationship between the
user and the service provider. This is to establish the customer satisfaction
and make sure there is effect on the feedback in order to satisfy their wants.
The
research concluded that if organizations are actively involved in competition
against each other, they will have to improve on all the factors as discussed
such as quality, prices and also have an up to date technology. The research
concludes that if service providers are to achieve competitive advantage among
each other, they will have to provide quality services. This hence will ensure
total satisfaction. The research concluded that if the organization provides
services at an affordable price they will be assured to keep the customers for
a long run only provided the quality of the service is also attached to it as
the case ofSafaricom not only the prices. The researcher concluded that
improved technology improves efficiency in terms of speed, accessibility and
improved network in relation to this matter.
5.4
Recommendations
5.4.1Competition
This is the way through
which the organizations contest for the market. They should make sure that the
competition is advantageous for both the service provider and the user of the
service not only to the service provider. Hence the service provider must be
aware that competition is the best way if reaching its voice to the customer.
5.4.2 Services
The
researcher recommended that improved
services and should be effectively implemented in order to create a good
personal contact .This will help the provider know what kind of services the
customer want and also help them improve their services and become better .The
service provider should always strive for the total customer satisfaction, this
is through the services they provide.
5.4.3
Price
The
research also recommended that although prices do not affect the customer’s
choice of mobile money transfer
services, good & fair prices is vital she also recommended that the prices
charged to the customers should be good and fair that will leave the customer
happy and be ready to come again.
5.4.4
Technology
Being
a 21st century where the digital world is always on the move the
research also recommended that improved technology is a necessity to good
performance of organizations. They should come up with improved systems that will
satisfy the customers fully this will include developing updated technology.
5.5
Suggestions for further Study
This study focused on four variables
only. There are other factors that affect customers’ choice of mobile money
transfer services in the mobile money industry in Kenya which were not part of
my study. It is suggested therefore that the future researchers should carry
out further research on the other factors that affect customers’ choice of
mobile money transfer services whichwill help in future to get more information
on how to improve the mobile money sector.
REFERENCES
Berkowitz, E…et al (2007)
Marketing, 5th edition. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston
Bickerton (1998) ‘A Prototype Design for Enhancing
Customer Trust in Online
Payments’. Journal of Computer Science 5 (12), 1034
Brown SW. (2000). Service recovery through IT.
Marketing management, 6(3):25 (3p). Available from: EBSCOHost: Business Source
Premier: http//search.global.epnet.com/ [Accessed: 2016-05-18].
Chin and Todd (1995)Marketing research,
Methodological Foundations.8th edition.
Orlando: Harcourt
College Publishers.
Cooper, D. R., & Emory, C. W. (1995). Business Research Methods,
Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.
Dahlberg, T., Mallat, N., Ondrus, J., &Zmijewska, A. (2008). Past,
present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review. Elsevier
B.V. Doi.
Davis (1989) Marketing strategy:
Planning and implementation. Chicago: Irwin.
Donna 2007, Just how transformational is m-banking?
Donovan (2011)“Mobile Money in the Developing World: The Impact
of M-PESA on Development, Freedom, and Domination”,
STIA Thesis, April
2010.Availablefrom:http://blurringborders.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/06/Donovan_MPESA_Thesis_Prepublication.pdf
Duncombe, R. and Boateng, R. (2009),
“Mobile phones and financial services in developing countries: a review of
concepts, methods, issues, evidence and future research direction”, Third
World Quarterly, Vol. 30 No. 7, pp. 1237‐58.
[CrossRef],
[ISI][Infotrieve]
Earl, P. (2007). “Consumer X-Inefficiency and the
Problem of Market Regulation.”
In
Renaissance in Behavioral Economics.Ed. Roger Frantz. London: Routledge.
Estelami, H.
(1998), “The price is right...or is it? Demographic and category effects on
consumer price knowledge”, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 7No.
3, pp. 254-66.
Foxall, G.
(1995), “Cognitive styles of consumer initiators”, Technovation, Vol. 15 No. 5,
pp. 269-89.
Frempong (2009)Frempong, Godfrey, F. (2009).Mobile telephone opportunities:
the case of micro- and small enterprises in Ghana. Info, 11(2), 79 – 94:
Accessed 11-10-2012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14636690910941902.
Goldsmith and Newel (1997)M-banking in developing markets: competitive and
regulatory implications.info, Vol. 12(1), 18 – 25.
Grewal, D.,
Gotlieb, J. and Marmorstein, H. (1994), “The moderating effects of message framing
and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship”, Journal of
Consumer Research, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 145-53.
GrΓΆnroos C. (1990). From marketing mix to
relationship marketing. Management
[Accessed: 2016-05-18].
Hanlon, D. and Luery, D (2002). “The role of pricing
research in assessing the
commercial
potential of new drugs development”, International Journal of Market
Research,
Fourth Quarter, Vol. 44, Pp. 423-447.
Horton, et al (2001)Behind the veil of human
capital. Observer 215.[Accessed: 2001-07-06].
How Craft, Bacett 1996 The International Journal of Engineering and Science
Irons K. 1997. The marketing of services: A total
approach to achieving competitive advantage. London: McGraw-Hill.
Kassim 2005, E-banking Serve Quality
Kasper H, van Helsdingen P & de Vries W. 1999.
Service Marketing Management: An International Perspective. Chichester: John
Wiley and Sons.
Lee et al (2011) internal marketing and supply chain
management, The journal of services marketing, 14(1):27-43.
Lovelock,
C.H., (1998), “Classifying Services to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights”,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47, Summer, pp. 9-20.
Kirton, M.J. (1976), “Adaptors
and innovators: a description and measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.
61 No. 5,pp. 622-9.
Klompmaker, J.E., Rodgers, W.H. and Nygren, A.E.
(2003). “Value, not volume”,
Marketing
Management, June, pp. 45-48.
Kotler 2006, Marketing Management, USA; Pearson Prentice Hall 12th
Edition
Kollmann, T. (2000), “The
price/acceptance function: perspectives of a pricing policy in
Europeantelecommunicationmarkets”,European Journal of Innovation Management,
Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 7-14.
Kotler P. (1996). Marketing management. New Jersey:
Prentice Hall
Kotler, P and Armstrong, G. (9th Edition) (2002), principles of
marketing, Pearson Education
Kotler, P., & Keller.(13th Ed).(2007), Marketing Management. USA: Pearson Prentice Hall
Korgaonkar,
P.K. and Smith, A.E. (1986), “Psychographic and demographic correlates of
electronic in-home shopping and banking service”, American Marketing
Association Proceedings, Chicago, IL, pp. 67-9.
Korgaonkar,
P.K. (1984), “Consumer shopping orientations, non-store retailers, and
consumers’ patronage intentions: a multivariate investigation”, Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science
Vol. 12, pp. 11-22
Leeladhar (2005)Risk Sharing and Transactions Costs: Evidence from Kenya’s
Mobile Money Revolution Working Paper.
Link, F.
(1997), “Diffusion dynamics and the pricing of innovations”, PhD thesis, Lund
University, Lund. Mc Connell, J.D. (1968), “An experimental examination of the
price-quality relationship”, The Journal of Business, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp.
439-44.
Lichtenstein,
D., Blonch, D. and Black, W. (1988),“Correlates of price acceptability”,
Journal of
Consumer Research, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 243-52.
Maina, P.M. (2000), Perceived Quality Service: The case of mobile Telephone
Services,
Unpublished MBA project,
University of Nairobi.
Maliat (2007) Mobile Money: Cell Phone Banking In Developing Countries. Policy
Matters Journal, Spring 2010, 27-33.
Martin, Julian (1988) The Hidden Advantages of Customer Retention. Journal
of Retail Banking, XII(4),19-23.
Mbogoh 2010 The impact of mobile payments on the success & growth of
micro-business
Mbiti& Well (2011) Mbiti, I., & Weil, D. N. (2011).“The Impact of
M-Pesa in Kenya”.NBER Working Paper No. 17129. JELL No. E40, 016, 033.
Michael and David (2003)Understanding
and designing marketing research 2nd edition.UK: Thompsons Learning
Meyer-Levy, J. and Sternthal,
B. (1991), “Gender differencesin the use of message cues and judgments”,
Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 84-96.
Munyoki, J. and Mutua, E. (2010), A Study of customer perception of M-pesa
services provided by SMEs in Kitengela and Athi River Township in Kenya, A
discussion paper presented on 6th ORSEA Conference held in Makerere
University Uganda in October 2010.
Nagle and Holden (2002) Mobile
Money Usage Patterns of Kenyan Small and Medium Enterprises. Innovations:
Technology, Governance, Globalization, Spring. 7 (2), 67-81
Nasikye 2009, A frame work for mobile banking in Uganda
Odhiambo, J.O. (2003). Customer Satisfaction: The case of mobile Telephone
Firms.
Unpublished MBA project,
University of Nairobi
Oryiek 2008, Contribution of Electronic banking to the effective
performance
Owen 2008, The International Journal
of Engineers & Science (IJES)
Palmer A & Cole C. (1994).Service marketing:
Principles and practice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Porter (1980)The impact of mobile phones in Africa, prepared for the
Commission for Africa, London, Serneels, P.
Reichheld 2006, Managing Global Supply Chain Relationships
Reichheld, L. (1996),corporate strategy, Pitman Publishing, London
Rother, F (1997) M-Pesa: Mobile
Money for the “Unbanked”, Turning Cell Phones into 24-hour Tellers in Kenya
Saleemi , N.A (1997) Marketing
simplified, Saleemi publishers, Nairobi
Santomero, A M., &Seater, J. J. (1996).Alternative monies and the
demand for media of exchange. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28(4) 942-960
Sarma, D. (2007). "Customer
Service from the Customer's Perspective".Professional Practice
Series. 20. John Wiley and Sons
Scherer, F. M., and David Ross.(1990). Industrial
Market Structure andEconomic Performance (3rd edition). Boston: Houghton
Mifflin.
Simon, H. and Butscher, S.A. (2001). “Individualized
Pricing: Boosting Profitability
with
a High Art of Power Pricing”, European Management Journal, Vol. 19, No.
2, Pp.
Stanoevska-Slabeva(2003)“Breaking Free from Product
Marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41, April, pp. 73-80.
Steamthal (1991) “Mobile
Phones and Economic Development in Africa”, Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 24(3), 207-232.
Stephen (2006) Mobile
Money Usage Patterns of Kenyan Small and Medium Enterprises. Innovations:
Technology, Governance, Globalization, Spring. 7 (2), 67-81.
Stingler 2008Performance Measurement System (PMS) in Small Medium
Enterprises (SMES): A Practical Modified Framework World Journal of Social
Sciences, Vol. 1(3) 200-2012.
Subramanian, G. (2013). Mobile Money:
A Theoretical study of Alternative Media of Exchange, and an Empirical study
with respect to M-Pesa in Kenya. Available at SSRN 2278679
Shy, O., &Takka, J. (2002). The market for electronic cash cards.
Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 34(2), 299-314.
Tobbin (2011)The emotional side of intellectual
capital.Training Scene. [online] Available from: http//www.hrinme.com/misc/
[Accessed: 2016-05-18].
Thomson F.K(2004), strategic change in marketing, USA Pearson prentice Hall
Urbanyet (1988)Bitter Money: Cultural Economy and Some African Meanings
of ForbiddenCommodities. Washington, DC: American Anthropological
Association.
Urbany, J.E.,
Bearden, W.O. and Weilbaker, D.C. (1988),“The effect of plausible and
exaggerated reference prices on consumer perceptions and price search”, Journal
of Consumer Research
, Vol. 15 No.
2, pp. 95-110.
Venkatesh& Davis (2000)An investigation of
marketing problems across service typologies. The journal of services
marketing, 14(7):573 -594.
Waterson, M. (2003).“The Role Consumers Play in
Competition andCompetition Policy.”International Journal of Industrial
Organization 21: 129–150.
Yadov, M. and
Monroe, K. (1993), “How buyers perceive savings in a bundle price: an
examination of a bundle’s transaction value”, Journal of Marketing Research,
Vol. 30No. 3, pp. 350-8.
Zeithaml, V., Parasuraman, A.
and Berry, L. (1990), Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perception
and Expectations, Free Press, New York, NY.
Zeng
et al (2003) Exploring marketing research 8th edition.
South-western: Thompson.
Zeithaml and Bitner (1996)Zeithaml VA &Bitner
MJ. 2003. Service Marketing 3rd edition. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
Zutt(2010)Zutt, J., (2010). Kenya Economic Update: Poverty Reduction
andEconomic Management Unit Africa Region Edition 3. World Bank
QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION
A: PERSONAL INFORMATION
Name of respondent (Optional)
- Gender
Male Female
- What is your age bracket?
Below 2.5 yrs. 26-35 yrs.
36-45 yrs. 46-60
yrs.
- What is your education level?
Masters degree Degree
Certificate Diploma
Others (Specify)
- For how long have you been using the mobile money transfer service?
Less than 5 yrs. Over 10 yrs.
6 to 10 yrs.
SECTION
A: COMPETITION
- Does competition determine the customer’s choice of mobile money transfer services in Kenya?
Yes
No
- How can you rate competition effect on choice of mobile money transfer service?
Very good Poor
Fair
- Suggest ways in which competition can be improved?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
SECTION
B:SERVICE
- Do services offered determine the customer’s choice of mobile money transfer service?
Yes
No
- How often do you use your mobile money transfer services?
Regularly
Rarely
- Which of the mobile money transfer service do you prefer?
Safaricom
Airtel
Orange
- Have you attended any training program in any mobile money transfer services?
Yes
No
.SECTION C: PRICE
- Does price determine customers’ choice of mabile money transfer service?
Yes
No
- To what extent does price determine customer’s choice of mobile money transfer services?
To a very great extent
To a great extent
To a low extent
Not at all
- In your own opinion how can the service providers improve their prices?
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
SECTION
D: TECHNOLOGY
- Does technology determine the customer’s choice of mobile money transfer services
Yes
No
- Does technology improve the relationship between the users and the service providers?
Yes
No
- To what extent does technology determine customer’s choice of mobile money transfer services?
To
a very great extent
To
a great extent
To
a low extent
Not
at all
- Suggest any way the service providers can do to avoid technology hiccups like failure in networks ………………………………………………………
……..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
ΓΌ Thank
you for taking your time to answer the questionnaire.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)